The New Faces of GWP*: Temperature neutrality and no additional warming
Briefing paper: The New Faces of GWP*
Our latest briefing paper, *The New Faces of GWP*, revisits the debate around this controversial metric and how it’s being used to distort progress on methane. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has explicitly rejected GWP*, and now we see more and more scientists worldwide doing the same.
In 2023, our report Seeing Stars exposed how GWP* can allow companies and countries to claim they are ‘climate neutral’ or even ‘cooling the planet’ while continuing to emit huge amounts of methane. This new briefing updates that research with fresh findings from freedom of information requests across Ireland, Aotearoa (New Zealand), Europe and Northern Ireland, looking at the state-of-play in the lead up to COP30.
It unpacks the new terminology emerging around the metric — from ‘no additional warming’ to ‘temperature neutrality’, being used to obscure the reality behind the use of the metric. The briefing paper also examines how countries’ use of GWP* translates into actual on-the-ground emissions.
You might also like...
The Meat Agenda: Agricultural Exceptionalism and Greenwash in Brazil
As Brazil prepares to host the 30th conference of the parties of UNFCCC (COP30) in heart of the Amazon, the country is positioning itself as a global climate leader with ambitious emissions reduction targets...
High Steaks: Taking methane from animal farming out of its blindspot
Methane emissions in the EU’s livestock sector are expected to drop by a mere 3.7% by 2030 with current policies, which means that the EU will not achieve its 30% commitments under the Global Methane Pledge.
Big Meat and Dairy’s narratives to derail climate action
Big Meat and Dairy companies are deploying ‘narratives’ in advertising, PR campaigns, and lobbying that paint the industry as greener than it really is and frame the stakes as too high to change. Like many p...