The New Faces of GWP*: Temperature neutrality and no additional warming
Briefing paper: The New Faces of GWP*
Our latest briefing paper, *The New Faces of GWP*, revisits the debate around this controversial metric and how it’s being used to distort progress on methane. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has explicitly rejected GWP*, and now we see more and more scientists worldwide doing the same.
In 2023, our report Seeing Stars exposed how GWP* can allow companies and countries to claim they are ‘climate neutral’ or even ‘cooling the planet’ while continuing to emit huge amounts of methane. This new briefing updates that research with fresh findings from freedom of information requests across Ireland, Aotearoa (New Zealand), Europe and Northern Ireland, looking at the state-of-play in the lead up to COP30.
It unpacks the new terminology emerging around the metric — from ‘no additional warming’ to ‘temperature neutrality’, being used to obscure the reality behind the use of the metric. The briefing paper also examines how countries’ use of GWP* translates into actual on-the-ground emissions.
You might also like...
Stranded in a vicious cycle? The case for transformation in animal agriculture
The production of meat and dairy is a significant source of carbon and methane emissions, but at the same time also uniquely dependant on stable climate conditions. In this briefing, we present a survey from...
Biogas in the EU: A policy and financial analysis – Profundo report
A policy and financial analysis by Profundo of EU policies and the policies of the UK, Denmark, Germany, Ireland, the Netherlands, Poland and Romania, commissioned by the Methane Matters Coalition.
Net-zero integrity: Nestlé’s methane blindspot
In light of its huge contribution towards global warming, this briefing analyses Nestlé’s climate plan to reach net zero by 2050.